POWERED BY WE HAVE A MEETING
THE DATA
ENABLEMENT
STATE
OF SALES
The State of Sales right now….
THE HOOK
Organisations with formal enablement programmes report win rates up to 49% higher than those without. Meanwhile 65% of the content marketing produces for sales never gets used, a figure that has held for a decade.
Sales Enablement Works. Most Versions of It Don't.
THE DATA · A 4-MINUTE READ
THE STATE OF SALES LENS
How we judged this: the 2026 enablement research from Highspot, the Sales Enablement Collective, Mindtickle's platform data and the CSO Insights lineage studies. Enablement works. Most versions of it are just built wrong, and the data shows exactly where.
01 · The function pays for itself when it is formal
65% of companies that beat their revenue targets had dedicated enablement teams. Among companies with no enablement function, only 24% outperformed. The through-line in every credible study: a charter, dedicated headcount, and measured coaching capture 20 to 30% advantages on win rate, attainment and ramp. Informal enablement, the shared drive and the goodwill of one overworked ops person, captures roughly none of it.
The number enablement owns should be one leadership already cares about: ramp time, win rate on coached deals, or process adherence. "Content published" and "training sessions delivered" are effort metrics, and effort metrics are how a function ends up first on the list when the budget tightens.
THE NUMBER 65% of outperformers run dedicated enablement.
THE MOVE
Give enablement a charter and a number it owns. A function without a metric is a suggestion.
02 · Less content, radically more usage
Reps waste up to 10 hours a week hunting for, comparing or rebuilding content, and 40% of content gets recreated because nobody could find the original. Forrester puts the waste at $2.3M a year per enterprise. The fix is brutal curation: Mindtickle reported content engagement climbing from 4% to 55% only after the library was cut by 76%. The lever is curation and workflow placement rather than more assets.
Placement matters as much as the cull. Content that lives in the CRM record, surfaced at the deal stage where it gets used, beats the same content in a beautifully organised portal nobody opens mid-call. The question is not "where should this live" but "where is the rep standing when they need it".
THE NUMBER engagement went from 4% to 55% after cutting 76% of the library.
DO THIS THIS WEEK
Archive everything untouched in 90 days. If nobody screams, it was already dead.
03 · Adoption is the entire ROI
Roughly a third of reps follow the sales process their team already wrote down, and the teams whose reps do adhere attain quota at several times the rate of those who do not. The same pattern runs through the AI enablement data: the returns show up where the tooling sits inside the daily workflow and reads real deal context. Disconnected AI generates activity. Connected AI changes outcomes.
Adherence is coached, not announced. The teams that get past one-in-three do it by making the process the language of every pipeline review: managers ask the framework's questions, deal by deal, until answering them becomes how reps think. The moment inspection stops, adherence drifts back inside a quarter.
THE NUMBER about one rep in three follows the documented process.
STEAL THIS
Measure process adherence before you measure anything else. Every other enablement metric sits downstream of it.
The verdict
Pick a formal function with a charter if you have more than 20 sellers. Below that, pick one owner, one curated library and one adopted process. Skip the platform until the process exists.
Enablement fails as a content factory and works as an adoption engine.
THE ONE THING
Enablement fails as a content factory and works as an adoption engine. Fund adoption.
Got a take on this one? Hit reply. We read every single one.
Every week we sit down with the operators actually moving revenue.
THE STATE OF SALES · TWICE WEEKLY · NO FLUFF